Thursday, September 11, 2014

CPP is using the same trick to demolish democrats

After joining with CPP in the parliament, CNRP has become "shadow" of CPP to face off with all protests and injustice Cambodian people within their networks and community. As noted:

  • CNRP's task forces in the parliament committees are working to deal with people of land grabs and injustice while the root of power are still resting in the grip of CPP. CNRP couldn't pressure or bring those land grab tycoons to justice in the past, but right now, CNRP is trying to show its ability through the arm-less parliamentary mechanism. How this scene can be prevailed at the end? The popularity will be handed to CNRP or CPP?
  • CPP has been using their similar tactic during their successful effort to demolish FUNCIPEC. The arm-forces, policemen and security guards are at the same tasks: to threaten, to arrest, to ban, to humiliate, to divide, to injure, to imprison, and to kill. 
  • Hun Sen is a warrior, he is not a politician. 
  • CPP has been effectively using "carrot and stick" approach to marginalize, to amputate, to divide, to neutralize, and to permanently hypnotize its opponents. 
  • CNRP is at the cross road of handling both: internal strength and external fanatics. Internally speaking, the group of HRP is still retaliating the group of SRP whom once competed with each other to lure $$$ from Khmers overseas to pocket its own agendas. This important grassroots spoiling is not a joke, but a real challenge to build sustainable future of the CNRP as well as the overall democrats. 
As a recommendation, the aggressive CPP has hardly experienced to bring its back popularity but this party just let their militarism tactic floating on the nonstopped flow, the CNRP's agents who are not honest, including the loose structure of internal administration of the CNRP, both shall engage in a large inflammation to the death end of democratic struggling in Cambodia.

As a tip, the CNRP must act honestly as the "loyal opposition" as stated. Everyone must adhere to this principle. None of the CNRP's parliamentary member and leader is allowed to be greedy, selfish and ignorant within this ring. Internal rules must be strict and decisive on those negligent.

KY

Thursday, May 29, 2014

CNRP is likely lacking efficient measure to maintain supporters from outside the country

CNRP which is born by the combining between SRP and HRP has seen been survived by the Cambodian abroad to inject money for its political movement. SRP for instance, has survived because of many generous Cambodians living abroad who love democracy and human rights, have tremendously and continuously donated money to support this democratic party.

Political analysts believe that CPP can not subdue democratic movement in Cambodia, if CPP cannot stop the donation from Cambodians abroads. This is one of the important political tactic for CPP to win over democratic party in Cambodia as this party has been gradually seen by the Cambodian people and international observers as a communist party, not a democratic party.

Hence, the combination of two, CNRP, gained its momentum and in just one year old, this party has become the front line opponent of CPP. However, this one year old born baby must learn and prepare many things to compete with the CPP. One of its important policy is to strengthen support-based agents among Cambodians abroads. But recent change through the inconsistent guidelines for abroad supporters is in doubt of destroying its supporting base rather than embodying a long-sighted policy.

According to the sources I received from public domains:

  • There is an official letter to create CNRP-NA immediately after CNRP was created
  • Later, there is an issuing of CNRP Guideline for overseas supporters to follow
  • And to affirm its direct power to enforce the overseas supporters, there is a letter of appointment of an ad hoc committee to mediate all conflicts
  • But it seems there is an upcoming guideline/enforcing letter in which the strongest and oldest supporting network of CNRP officially created CNRP-NA has issued its worrisome and standing in unity for all inconsistent guideline(s) which are erroneous, detrimental and devastating to the supporters in foreign countries especially this strongest and oldest supporting network. (Please, read all photos attached here for your further information).
  • Thus, CNRP especially its two prominent leaders, must not issue erroneous letter that can power-abused to the existing letters and the existing supporting networks.  






Thank you,
KY

New shift of political situation in Cambodia

Dear Readers;

It is my privilege to anticipate a new trend of political situation in Cambodia.

  1. The confrontation between Vietnam with China has headached Hun Sen to choose one of them. As the result, Hun Sen visited China and kowtowed more loan to sustain his illegal government. Those money are indebted by Cambodian people, not Hun Sen or his team. Hun Sen, a kind of dictatorship leader, has used his own people as the tool to ask for loans, aids and personal power. In the sight of Hun Sen, people are just his objects, not subjects at all. Therefore, the conflict with China made Vietnamese weak in Cambodia. As the matter of fact, the ongoing power shifting of national police commanders in Cambodia in each province is on the agenda to swap and reappoint. This action happens because of Chinese's pinpoint or the unfavorable groups of Vietnamese agents in Cambodia are working on its way to reduce the authority of former special agents of Vietnamese soldiers who have impostered among important positions of national policemen and provincial policemen divisions.
  2. The military coup in Thailand has shifted Hun Sen-Taksin relationship out of context. Hence, Hun Sen proclaimed not to allow government in exile intended to create by Thaksin in Cambodia, is legally appropriate by international law and Cambodia law, but who is going to trust on Hun Sen's flip-flop political rhetoric?
  3. CPP has faced a new challenge by the growing up of well-informed citizens and people journalists of Cambodia especially among youths who are representing major bulk of national population. CNRP has gained its momentum but this party is facing internal bonding as many experienced members of SRP are consistently courted by less experienced HRP members. The internal rules are not adopted and individuals are power-abused without knowing their own duties or lacking knowledge on their jobs. Many new elected-MP members from HRP are generally opportunistic. The CNRP party must adopt a consistent internal rules, regulations, job descriptions and state clearly that the members of central committees must obtain exact qualifications, education and position. Two top leaders have likely obtained different characteristics: while Sam Rainsy and Kem Sokha have favored family-based approach to build trust for their political career, Sam Rainsy has been seen clean and not an opportunistic or a corrupted leader, but Kem Sokha is in contrast. Kem Sokha has seen often used his position to solicit for donation from outside donors to use for his personal projects, for his daughters and for his wife. Among those donors, the Cambodia National Rescue Foundation (CNRF) is seen one of the biggest donors to donate huge money to Kem Sokha. This foundation is not only doing that, it has exposed favoritism towards Kem Sokha lonely, by rejecting Sam Rainsy or Mu Sochua etc. 

Please, keep in tune for more political update to come!

Regards
KY    

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

នរណា​ជា ហ៊ុន សែន នរណា​ជា សម រង្ស៊ី?


នរណា​ជា ហ៊ុន សែន នរណា​ជា សម រង្ស៊ី?

ឯក​ឧត្តម​សម រង្ស៊ី និង​សម្តេច​តេជោ​ហ៊ុន សែន ទាំង​ពីរ​នាក់​ ជា​វីរជន​ខ្មែរ មាន​ដើម​កំណើត​ជា​ខ្មែរ ហើយ​ស្រឡាញ់​ជាតិ​សាសន៍​ខ្លួន​ដូច​គ្នា។ ទោះ​ជា​មាន​កំណើត​ពី​ម្តាយ​ទីទៃ លោក​ទាំង​ពីរ​គឺ​ជា​បង​ប្អូន​នឹង​គ្នា​ក្នុង​នាម​ជា​ឈាម​ជ័រ​នៃ​ពូជ​អម្បូរ​ ខ្មែរ​អង្គរ ដែល​មាន​អរិយធម៌​ខ្ពង់​ខ្ពស់​រុងរឿង​ក្នុង​សម័យ​អតីតកាល។
Tuesday, 12 March 2013
ជូ លាងហាក់
ភ្នំពេញ ប៉ុស្តិ៍
លោក​ ហ៊ុន សែន​​ និង លោក សម រង្ស៊ី។ រូប​ថត ផា លីណា និង Bloomberg
លោក​ ហ៊ុន សែន​​ និង លោក សម រង្ស៊ី។ រូប​ថត ផា លីណា និង Bloomberg
ចាប់ ​ពី​ដើម​ទសវត្សរ៍​ទី​៧០ ខ្ញុំ​មិន​ដឹង​ជា​ឯក​ឧត្តម​សមរង្ស៊ី ស្ថិត​នៅ​ឯណា ហើយ​បាន​ធ្វើ​ការ​បម្រើ​ជាតិ​ក្នុង​ស្ថាប័ន​ណា​ខ្លះ​នោះ​ទេ។  ប៉ុន្តែ​តាម​សារ​ព័ត៌មាន​នានា គេ​បរិយាយ​ថា សម្តេច​ហ៊ុន សែន​ក្នុង​ជំនាន់​នោះ លោក​ជា​អតីត​សមមិត្ត​ទាហាន​ព្រៃ ធ្វើ​ការ​រួម​ដៃ​យ៉ាង​ស្និទ្ធស្នាល​ជា​មួយ​ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម​តាម​ជាយដែន ក្រោម​ការ​ដឹក​នាំ​លោក​ប៉ុលពត ដែល​ទាហាន​ព្រៃ​ទាំង​នោះ បាន​សម្លាប់​ប្រជាជន​ខ្មែរ​អស់​ជាង​មួយ​លាន​ ៧ សែន​នាក់ ក្រោយ​ពេល​ដែល​ពួក​គេ​បាន​វាយ​ប្រហារ ខ្មែរ​សាធារណ​រដ្ឋ​របប​លន់ នល់ ដែល​ជា​ខ្មែរ​ដូច​គ្នា ឲ្យ​ដួល​រលំ​ នៅ​ក្នុង​ថ្ងៃ​ទី១៧ ខែ​មេសា​ឆ្នាំ​១៩៧៥​។ ក្រោយ​ពី​ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម​បាន​រំលាយ​ប្រទេស និង​សម្លាប់​រាស្ត្រ​ខ្មែរ ដ៏​ច្រើន​រួច​ហើយ សាមគ្គីភាព​ត្រូវ​រលំ​បែក​បាក់ ហើយ​បក្ខ​ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម​ម្ខាង ដែល​មាន​សម្តេច​ហ៊ុន សែន សម្តេច​ជា ស៊ីម និង​ សម្តេច ហេង សំរិន​ជា​អ្នក​ដឹក​នាំ បាន​រត់​ទៅ​ពឹង​​យួន​ ឲ្យ​ចូល​មក​វាយ​ប្រហារ បាញ់​សម្លាប់​ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម ប៉ុល ពត ដែល​មុន​នេះ​បន្តិច ពួក​គេ​គឺ​ជា​បង​ប្អូន​រួម​ឈាម រួម​អាវុធ រួម​ចាន​ឆ្នាំង​បាយ​ទឹក​ជាមួយ​គ្នា​សោះ។ បន្ទាប់​មក​របប ៣ ឆ្នាំ ៨ ខែ ២០ថ្ងៃ របស់​ ប៉ុល ពត គ្រប់​គ្រង​ប្រទេស​ខ្មែរ ក៏​ដួល​គ្រេង​ទៅ​ក្នុង​កណ្តាប់​ដៃ​នៃ​កង​ប្រដាប់​អាវុធ​វៀតណាម។
ជាយ ថា​ហេតុ​ រាស្ត្រ​ខ្មែរ​ទាំង​ផ្ទៃ​ប្រទេស​ ក៏​បាន​ឆ្លង​ផុត​ទុក្ខ​ទោស​មហាវេទនា​មួយ​គ្រា​។ ខ្មែរ​ចាប់​ផ្តើម​រៀបចំ​ស្រុក​ទេស ក្រោម​ការ​ត្រួត​ត្រា​របស់​កងទ័ព​វៀតណាម។  ក្នុង​ថិរវេលា​ប៉ុន្មាន​ឆ្នាំ​ដំបូង នៃ​ការ​រៀបចំ​ស្រុក​ទេស​ឲ្យ​មាន​សន្តិភាព វីរជន​ខ្មែរ​ បាន​ប្រើ​ទាហាន​ខ្មែរ​ឲ្យ​ទៅ​ស្លាប់…​មិន​មែន​ស្លាប់​ដើម្បី​ការ​ពារ​ផល​ ប្រយោជន៍​ប្រទេស​ជាតិ​ឯណា ​តែ​គេ​ចូល​ទៅ​ស្លាប់ ក្នុង​ការ​វាយ​ប្រហារ​ដណ្តើម​អំណាច​គ្នា​រវាង​មេ​ដឹក​នាំ​ខ្មែរ ហើយ​សម្តេច ​ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​ទទួល​ជោគជ័យ សុខ​សប្បាយ​រីករាយ និង​បាន​ទទួល​តំណែង​ជា​នាយក​រដ្ឋ​មន្ត្រី នៃ​រដ្ឋ​កម្ពុជា​។ ទាហាន​ដែល​ស្លាប់​ គឺ​ស្លាប់​ដោយ​គ្មាន​បាន​ទទួល​កិត្តិយស​អ្វី​សោះ​ តែ​គេ​ស្លាប់​ក្នុង​ន័យ​ការពារ​ផល​ប្រយោជន៍​ឯកជន។

Saturday, January 12, 2013

Mr. Sar Kheng is like Mr. Hun Sen, both are holding fake power

Opinion of Khmer Youth;

Policy of planting population as the key cells in achieving its goal is the priority that Vietnam government has attentively undertaken. Both Cambodia and Lao have faced new challenges of many Vietnamese population are settling in their land freely and anarchically.

In Cambodia, the 9 years of colonialization between 1979 to 1989, Vietnam achieved its primary plan to ensure that their population are strongly locating throughout this land. Including installing its uneducated puppet in power under the strict assistance of security guards and mechanism to win election; Vietnam plan is very civilized and modernized. It has concealed itself from the eyes of international law.

-->

I listened Mr. Sar Kheng's interview with RFI today with extreme concern. He is not different from Hun Sen who loves power, incapable to discard Vietnam's political game and afraid of personal security. Mr.Sar Kheng at least must comprehend about the Vietnamese networks in Cambodia and he cannot conceal this truth: Vietnamese population is increasingly living in economic zones entire Cambodia such as bus stations, Tonle Sap lake and police head quarters every province are controlled by former Vietnamese soldiers. If Mr. Sar Kheng is capable in his present power, he should allow Cambodian security guards to safeguard the entrance doors of the Ministry of Interior, not the Vietnamese security guards like nowadays. For Hun Sen, can bow down in front of Vietnamese people or he can lick their urine any time if ordered come to him.